Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science

DIFFERENCES ON ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE HAND BASED ON LATERALITY IN SERBIAN CONTEXT


DOI: 10.5937/jaes18-27612
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Creative Commons License

Volume 18 article 704 pages: 387 - 392

Vesna Spasojevic Brkic*
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia

Zorica Veljkovic
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia

Aleksandar Brkic
University of Belgrade, Innovation Center of Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia

Martina Perisic
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia

Anthropometric data are essential for designers of products, while hand anthropometric measurements are of special importance due to the fact that grasp enables different manipulation tasks. Literature review shows that differences on anthropometric characteristics of the hand based on laterality in Serbian context have not been examined till now, so this study tested it on the sample containing 110 subjects - 23 left-handed and 87 right-handed. Hand anthropometric measurements include 30 anthropometric dimensions measured on each examined participant. Dimensions are taken by capturing the imprints of the subjects’ outstretched hands. Collected data were subjected to descriptive statistics, t-test, Kolmogorov test and Mann-Withney U* tests. Also, 5th and 95th percentiles are calculated on all dimensions. Results show that there are no statistically significant differences based on laterality in Serbian context. Accordingly, hand tools and many other equipment, which are controlled by means of Serbian operator could be designed in the same manner both for workers whose dominant had is left and right. Also, percentiles values are calculated and should be taken into account in design processes. It is recommended, in future research to enlarge sample, repeat statistical testing and analyze hand grasp possible issues.

View article

The paper is supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, grants from project E!13300 (Hoisting and Mining Machinery Context Specific Adaptive Risk Prevention Expert System) and contract 451-03-68/2020-14/200105 (subproject TR 35017 on the topic: "Integrated research in the fields of macro, micro and nano mechanical engineering"). The authors also thank participants for their cooperation.

1. Spasojevic-Brkic, V., Veljkovic, Z., Essdai, A. A., & Brkic, A. [2019].  Differences in anthropometric measurements between Libyan and Serbian passenger car drivers and crane operators.  Journal of Applied Engineering Science, vol. 17(1), 1-7. vol. 17(1), 1-7.

2. Spasojevic -Brkic, V. K., Veljkovic, Z., & Brkic, A. [2015]. Crane Cabins’s Safety and Ergonomics Characteristics Evaluation Based on Data Collected in Sweden Port. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 13(4), 299-306.

3. Mohammad, Y. A. (2005). Anthropometric characteristics of the hand based on laterality and sex among Jordanian. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 8, 747-754, DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.11.005

4. Lee, K. S., & Jung, M. C. (2015). Ergonomic evaluation of biomechanical hand function. Safety and health at work, vol. 6, no. 1, 9-17, DOI: 10.1016/j. shaw.2014.09.002

5. Seo, N. J., Sindhu, B. S., & Shechtman, O. (2011). Influence of pain associated with musculoskeletal disorders on grip force timing. Journal of hand therapy, vol. 24, no. 4, 335-344, DOI: 10.1016/j. jht.2011.06.004

6. Kawaguchi, K., Endo, Y., & Kanai, S. (2009, July). Database-driven grasp synthesis and ergonomic assessment for handheld product design. In International Conference on Digital Human Modeling (pp. 642-652). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02809-0_68

7. Boz, C., Ozmenoglu, M., Altunayoglu, V., Velioglu, S. K., & Alioglu, Z. (2004). Individual risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome: an evaluation of body mass index, wrist index and hand anthropometric measurements. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, vol. 106, no. 4, 294-299, DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.01.002

8. Barut, C., Demirel, P., & Kıran, S. (2008). Evaluation of hand anthropometric measurements and grip strength in basketball, volleyball and handball players. Anatomy, vol. 2, no. 1, 55-59, DOI: 10.2399/ ana.08.055

9. Kulaksiz, G., & Gozil, R. (2002). The effect of hand preference on hand anthropometric measurements in healthy individuals. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, vol. 184, no. 3, 257-265, DOI: 10.1016/S0940-9602(02)80119-4

10. Angst, F., Drerup, S., Werle, S., Herren, D. B., Simmen, B. R., & Goldhahn, J. (2010). Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, vol. 11, no. 1, art. 94, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-94

11. Bohannon, R. W., & Schaubert, K. L. (2005). Test– retest reliability of grip-strength measures obtained over a 12-week interval from community-dwelling elders. Journal of hand therapy, vol. 18, no. 4, 426- 428, DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.003

12. Koley, S., Kaur, N., & Sandhu, J. S. (2009). A study on hand grip strength in female labourers of Jalandhar, Punjab, India. Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 1 no. 1, 57-62, DOI: 10.1080/09751270.2009.11885135

13. Cakit, E., Durgun, B., Cetik, O., & Yoldas, O. (2014). A survey of hand anthropometry and biomechanical measurements of dentistry students in Turkey. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, vol. 24, no. 6, 739-753, DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20401

14. Choi, H. S., & Choi, Y. H. (2016). Accuracy of Tablet Counts Estimated by Members of the Public and Healthcare Professionals. Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, 69-74

15.Hisao, H., Whitestone, J., Kau, T. Y., & Hildreth, B. (2015). Firefighter hand anthropometry and structural glove sizing: a new perspective. Human factors, vol. 57, no. 8, 1359-1377, DOI: 10.1177/0018720815594933

16. Mora, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., & Perez-Gonzalez, A. (2012). Hand posture prediction using neural networks within a biomechanical model. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, 139, DOI: 10.5772/52057

17. Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2005). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. CRC press.

18. Xiong, C. H., Chen, W. R., Sun, B. Y., Liu, M. J., Yue, S. G., & Chen, W. B. (2016). Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic hand for replicating human grasping functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 3, 652-671, DOI: 10.1109/ TRO.2016.2558193

19. NASA (1978), Anthropometric Source Book, Anthropology Research Project. Anthropometric source book (Vol. 2). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office. Washington

20. Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2013). Applied statistics and probability for engineers, (6 ed). John Wiley & Sons.