DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-26922
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 19 article 790 pages: 275-281
The system to ensure manufacturability of industrial products is aimed at reducing the costs of all types of resources
at the stages of their life cycle, selecting the most competitive in cost and functionality designs at the early stages of
engineering. When assessing the new designs for manufacturability to be developed and selecting the best analogue
or basic reference standard in terms of manufacturability, the engineer faces the need to apply multicriteria optimization
methods. The solution of the applied task of design optimization by quantitative criteria of manufacturability
in the conditions of an uncertain design and production environment is considered in the article as implementable
in the system for ensuring design for manufacturability. The decisive rules for implementing the multi-step process
of ranking the design options according to the manufacturability criteria with the construction of the Pareto tuple are
formed. The implementation of the method is exemplified in practice when choosing the oscilloscope design that is
advantageous in terms of manufacturability at a mass-production instrument-making plant
1. Anderson, D.M. (2014). Design for Manufacturability: How to use concurrent engineering to rapidly develop low-cost high-quality products for lean production. New York: Productivity Press. DOI: 10.1201/ b16501.
2. Selvaraj, P., Radhakrishnan, P. and Adithan, M. (2009). An integrated approach to design for manufacturing and assembly based on reduction of product development time and cost. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 13-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1580-8.
3. Barnawal, P., Dorneich, M.C., Peters, F. and Frank, M.C. (2016). Design and evaluation of designer feedback system in design for manufacturability.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 59, No 1, 1142-1146. DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591167.
4. Gupta, S.K., Regli, W.C., Das, D. and Nau, D.S. (1997). Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 9, No 3, 168-190.
5. Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M., Ridgman, T.W. and Clarkson, P.J. (2015). A FBS Linkage ontology and technique to support engineering change management. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 26, No 1, 3-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00163-014-0181-9.
6. Shukor, S.A. and Axinte, D. (2009). Manufacturability analysis system: issues and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, 1369-1390. DOI: 10.1080/00207540701589398.
7. Zhou, Yu. and Saitou, K. (2014). Identification of manufacturability constraints through process simulation and data mining, 19th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference, Buffalo, New York, USA. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2014-34542.
8. Cochrane, S., Young, R., Case, K., Harding, J., Gao, J., Dani, Sh. and Baxter, D. (2008). Knowledge reuse in manufacturability analysis. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, No 4, 508-513. DOI:10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.003.
9. Young, R.I.M, Guerra, D., Gunendran, G., Das, B., Cochrane, S. and Cutting-Decelle, A-F. (2005). Sharing manufacturing information and knowledge in design decision support. In: A. Bramley, D. Brissaud, D. Coutellier and McMahon, C. (Eds.), Advances in integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering (pp. 173-188), Netherlands: Springer.
10. Menold, J., Simpson, T.W. and Jablokow, K. (2018). The prototype for X framework: exploring the effects of a structured prototyping framework on functional prototypes. Research in Engineering Design, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-018-0289-4.
11. Salhieh,S.M. (2008). Developing manufacturing response models to predict the manufacturability of new modular products. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 39, No 5–6, 599-611. DOI:10.1007/s00170-007-1232-4.
12. Irzaev, G.Kh. (2018). Multicriteria analysis of product operational effectiveness at design stages. 1th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Automation and Control Systems, MEACS 2017, Tomsk, Russian Federation, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 327, Issue 2, 022-049, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/327/2/022049.
13. Lynn, R., Saldana, Ch., Kurfess, T., Reddy, N., Simpson, T., Jablokow, K., Tucker, T., Tedia, S. and Williams, Ch. (2016). Toward rapid manufacturability analysis tools for engineering design education. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 5, 1183-1196, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.093.
14. Sharma, R. and Gao, J.X. (2007). A knowledge- based manufacturing and cost evaluation system for product design/re-design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 33, No 9-10, 856-865.DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006- 0530-6.
15. Kim, Yu-Gyeong, Jung, Yung-Jin, Kim, Hyun-Soo and Ahn, Hee-Jae. (2015). Design assessment of triangular support bracket for manufacturability. Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 98–99, 1519-1523, DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.004.
16. Zhang, Jiang-Long, Zhang, Zheng and Han, Yu. (2017). Research on manufacturability optimization of discrete products with 3D printing involved and lot-size considered. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 43, No 1, 150-159, DOI:10.1016/j. jmsy.2017.03.002.
17. Trobe-Bateman, J. La and Wild,D. (2003). Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14, No 2, (2003), 107-117.
18. Irzaev, G.Kh. (2007). Expert selection of the preferred option for manufacturability products by analytical hierarchy. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. Vol. 29, No 1, 126-130.
19. Roy, B. (1968). Classementetchoixen presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE). RAIRO - Operations Research – Recherche Operationnelle, Vol. 2, No. V1, 57-75.