DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-29694
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 19 article 797 pages: 327-333
During the production time, it is crucial to manage the reservoir efficient productivity and keep it at a profitable level.
Matrix acidizing in carbonate reservoirs is a common course of action to increase the efficiency of production. The
present project is based on an integrated multi-disciplinary plan as an arena to merge traditional and novel technologies
in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geoscience, chemical engineering, computer vision and
mineralogy. Some crucial parameters such as permeability/porosity changes occurred during carbonate acidizing are
modelled and analyzed based on various modern technologies, such as, the novel digital rock technologies. A waste
variety of nanoparticles is also used in order to design a novel acid mixture for stimulating the carbonate reservoirs.
Specifically, this study is considered as a one-step forward in development of smart encapsulated acid systems using
a range of hydrophobic silica nanoparticles in various grades of hydrophobicity. Furthermore, the present study can be
considered as the first practical example for application of digital rock physics in improvement of acidizing operation
in Iran and Russia.
The proposed research methods are consist of preparation of encapsulated acids, sample and data collection, conventional
core analysis, digital core analysis, lab experiments and modelling and conclusion. Characterization of the
efficiency of this process was once more characterized using the aforementioned digital rock technologies to visualize
the effect of encapsulated acid fracturing operation, impact of surface modification of silica NPs on the etching
efficiency, the physical properties of core samples, and subsequently the final productivity index. Thin section, SEM
and FE-SEM analysis was then performed to further evidence the efficiency of this method. Furthermore, the efficiency
of this method was categorized based on the identified mineralogy and rock composition.
It was concluded that the dissolution rate was significantly increased as a result of acid neutralization control and
the reaction rate decreased which in turn resulted in more homogenous patterns of wormholes, higher permeability,
and so, more successful acid treatment. Thanks to the reduced accessible surface of acid systems caused by their
emulsion-based nature, it was found that this novel encapsulation process can reduce the risks of corrosion in all the
equipment in surface and bottom hole. It naturally reduces the extra costs of corrosion-related damages and subsequent
workover operations, which are the common need of most of the wells treated by conventional acid fracturing
operations.
1. ABASS, H. H., AL-MULHEM, A. A., ALQAM, M. H. & KHAN, M. R. Acid fracturing or proppant fracturing in carbonate formation? A rock mechanics view. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
2. ABDELFATAH, E., BANG, S., POURNIK, M., SHIAU, B. J., HARWELL, J., HAROUN, M. & RAHMAN, M. Acid diversion in carbonates with nanoparticles- based in situ gelled acid. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
3. ALLEN, T. O. & ROBERTS, A. P. 1993. Production operations: well completions, workover, and stimulation, Oil & Gas Consultants International, Inc.
4. ARNS, C. H., BAUGET, F., GHOUS, A., SAKELLARIOU, A., SENDEN, T. J., SHEPPARD, A. P., SOK, R. M., PINCZEWSKI, W. V., KELLY, J. C. & KNACKSTEDT, M. A. 2005. Digital core laboratory: Petrophysical analysis from 3D imaging of reservoir core fragments. Petrophysics, 46, 260-277.
5. CIVAN, F. 2015. Reservoir formation damage, Gulf Professional Publishing.
6. ECONOMIDES, M. J. & MARTIN, T. 2007. Modern fracturing: Enhancing natural gas production, ET publishing Houston.
7. ECONOMIDES, M. J. & NOLTE, K. G. 1989. Reservoir stimulation, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. ECONOMIDES, M. J. & NOLTE, K. G. 2000. Reservoir Stimulation, Chichester, England, John Wiley & Sons.
9. ECONOMIDES, M. J., HILL, A. D. & EHLIG-ECONOMIDES, C. 2012. Petroleum production systems, Pearson Education.
10. FREDD, C. N. 1998. The Influence of Transport and Reaction on Wormhole Formation in Carbonate Porous Media: A Study of Alternative Stimulation Fluids. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
11. GOLAN, M. & WHITSON, C. H. 1991. Well test performance.
12. GUO, T., LI, Y., DING, Y., QU, Z., GAI, N. & RUI, Z. 2017. Evaluation of acid fracturing treatments in shale formation. Energy & Fuels, 31, 10479-10489.
13. HUANG, T. & CREWS, J. B. 2008. Nanotechnology applications in viscoelastic surfactant stimulation fluids. SPE production & operations, 23, 512-517.
14. JAFARPOUR, H., MOGHADASI, J., KHORMALI, A., PETRAKOV, D. & ASHENA, R. 2019. Increasing the stimulation efficiency of heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs by developing a multi-bached acid system. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 172, 50-59.
15. KALFAYAN, L. 2008. Production enhancement with acid stimulation, Pennwell Books.
16. KALFAYAN, L. J. Fracture acidizing: History, present state, and future. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
17. KHAIBULLINA, K.S., KOROBOV, G.Y., & LEKOMTSEV, A.V. (2020). Development of an asphalt-resin- paraffin deposits inhibitor and substantiation of the technological parameters of its injection into the bottom-hole formation zone. Periodico Tche Quimica, 17(34), 769-781.
18. KNACKSTEDT, M. A., SENDEN, T. J., CARNERUP, A. & FOGDEN, A. 2011. Improved Characterization of EOR Processes in 3D. Characterizing Mineralogy, Wettability and Residual Fluid Phases at the Pore Scale. Paper SPE 145093, presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 19-21 July.
19. KOROLEV, M., ROGACHEV, M., & TANANYKHIN, D. (2020). Regulation of filtration characteristics of highly watered terrigenous formations using complex chemical compositions based on surfactants. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 2020, vol. 18, br. 1, str. 147-156. doi:10.5937/jaes18-24542
20. LATHAM, S., VARSLOT, T. & SHEPPARD, A. P. 2008. Image Registration: Enhancing and Calibrating X-ray Micro-CT Imaging. Paper SCA2008-35, presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. Abu Dhabi, UAE: 29 October- 2 November, 2008.
21. LI, N., DAI, J., LIU, P., LUO, Z. & ZHAO, L. 2015. Experimental study on influencing factors of acid-fracturing effect for carbonate reservoirs. Petroleum, 1, 146-153.
22. MARDASHOV, D., ISLAMOV, S., & NEFEDOV, Y. (2020). Specifics of well killing technology during well service operation in complicated conditions. Periodico Tche Quimica, 17(34), 782-792.
23. MIGAHED, M. & NASSAR, I. 2008. Corrosion inhibition of Tubing steel during acidization of oil and gas wells. Electrochimica Acta, 53, 2877-2882.
24. MOGHADASI, J., JAMIALAHMADI, M., MULLER-STEINHAGEN, H., SHARIF, A., IZADPANAH, M. R., MOTAEI, E. & BARATI, R. 2002. Formation Damage in Iranian Oil Fields. International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. Lafayette, Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
25. NEEMLA, K., SAXENA, R. & JAYARAMAN, A. 1992. Corrosion inhibition of oil-well equipment during acidization. Corrosion Prevention and Control, 39, 69-73.
26. QAJAR, J. & ARNS, C. H. 2016. Characterization of reactive flow-induced evolution of carbonate rocks using digital core analysis- part 1: Assessment of pore-scale mineral dissolution and deposition. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 192, 60-86.
27. QAJAR, J., FRANCOIS, N. & ARNS, C. 2013. Microtomographic Characterization of Dissolution-Induced Local Porosity Changes Including Fines Migration in Carbonate Rock. SPE Journal, 18, 545-562.
28. SABUKEVICH, V.S., PODOPRIGORA, D.G., & SHAGIAKHMETOV, A.M. (2020). Rationale for selection of an oil field optimal development system in the eastern part of the pechora sea and its calculation. Periodico Tche Quimica, 17(34), 634-655.
29. SAKELLARIOU, A., SENDEN, T. J., SAWKINS, T. J., KNACKSTEDT, M. A., TURNER, M. L., JONES, A. C., SAADATFAR, M., ROBERTS, R. J., LIMAYE, A., ARNS, C. H., SHEPPARD, A. P. & SOK, R. M. An x-ray tomography facility for quantitative prediction of mechanical and transport properties in geological, biological and synthetic systems. Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV, 2004. 473-484.
30. SCHECHTER, R. S. 1992. Oil well stimulation.
31. SPANNE, P., THOVERT, J. F., JACQUIN, C. J., LINDQUIST, W. B., JONES, K. W. & ADLER, P. M. 1994. Synchrotron Computed Microtomography of Porous Media: Topology and Transports. Physical Review Letters, 73, 2001-2004.
32. TANANYKHIN, D., TCVETKOV, P., KAMOZA, V. (2018) Analysis and Recommendations of Sand Consolidation Methods to Limit Sand Production in Gas Wells. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1072, 012022. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1072/1/012022
33. WILLIAMS, B. B., GIDLEY, J. L. & SCHECHTER, R. S. 1979. Acidizing fundamentals, Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME.
34. XU, C., KANG, Y., YOU, Z. & CHEN, M. 2016. Review on formation damage mechanisms and processes in shale gas reservoir: Known and to be known.
35. YUAN, B., BEDRIKOVETSKY, P., HUANG, T., MOGHANLOO, R. G., DAI, C., VENKATRAMAN, A., SUN, B., THOMAS, D., WANG, L. & WOOD, D. 2016. Special issue: Formation damage during enhanced gas and liquid recovery. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 36, 1051-1054.
36. SKRYPCHUK, P., ZHUKOVSKYY, V., SHPAK, H., ZHUKOVSKA, N., & KRUPKO, H. (2020). Applied aspects of humus balance modelling in the rivne region of ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21(6), 42-52. doi:10.12911/22998993/123255
37. RAHMAN, P. A., & BOBKOVA, E. Y. (2017). The reliability model of the fault-tolerant computing system with triple-modular redundancy based on the independent nodes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 803(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/803/1/012125
38. ZHUKOVSKYY, V., ZHUKOVSKA, N., VLASYUK, A., & SAFONYK, A. (2019). Method of forensic analysis for compromising carrier-lock algorithm on 3G modem firmware. Paper presented at the 2019 IEEE 2nd Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, UKRCON 2019 - Proceedings, 1179- 1182. doi:10.1109/UKRCON.2019.8879941