DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-40083
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 21 article 1088 pages: 440-450
This research is carried out to investigate and assess the dynamic soil-structure interaction features related to a reinforced concrete building. Numerical analysis and mathematical simulations were performed depending on the ABAQUS® software package to achieve the study goal. Structures with floor numbers ranging between one and ten were modelled and simulated, and soil characteristics were explored and measured in terms of base shear, axial force, moment, and displacement, taking into account dynamic soil-structure interaction principles. In addition, the effect of soil type on the building stability and soil performance was assessed and examined. The research findings revealed that the base shear for a five-floor building frame decreases by 5% from soft to medium soil and by 23% from medium to hard soil. Also, the base shear for a five-floor building frame reduces by 5% from soft to medium soil and by 23% from medium to hard soil. The base shear for a shear wall system with ten stories on medium soil is 20% less than that on soft soil. On hard soil, this outcome is lowered by 12%. The axial force for a five-floor building frame decreases by 2% from mild to medium soil and by 8% from medium to hard soil. Additionally, axial forces provide a 9% decrease for medium soil and a 4% reduction for hard soil in a 10-floor building frame resistance system. There is a reduction of 3% from soft to medium soil and a reduction of 12% on hard soil regarding axial force. Meantime, the axial forces are lesser for medium soil by 13% compared to soft soil and less by 6 % for hard soil. The displacement is decreased by 6% in a 5-floor building frame system on medium soil and 11% on hard soil. However, the displacement of a 10-floor building structure is reduced by 10% on medium soil and 22% on hard soil. Displacement in a five-floor shear wall structure is decreased by 6% and 18% on medium and hard soil. Also, displacement reduces by 20% and 30% on medium and hard soil, respectively.
1. Kamp, H. V. D., Harris, M., & Gallagher, V. (2018). Soil: Construction, Planning and Extraction. In The Soils of Ireland (pp. 281-289). Springer, Cham.
2. Psarropoulos, P. N., Tsompanakis, Y., & Katsirakis, M. (2022). Dynamic soil-structure interaction between retaining walls, retaining soil and retained structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1-25.
3. Ayala, F., Sáez, E., & Magna-Verdugo, C. (2022). Computational modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction in shear wall buildings with basements in medium stiffness sandy soils using a subdomain spectral element approach calibrated by micro-vibrations. Engineering Structures, 252, 113668.
4. Afriani, L., & Perdana, R. (2022). Effect of Sand Faction Percentage in Soil Mixture towards Soil Support Power for Dam Construction. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022.
5. Zhang, X., & Far, H. (2022). Effects of dynamic soil-structure interaction on seismic behaviour of high-rise buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20(7), 3443-3467.
6. Vinay, N., Jayalekshmi, B. R., & Shivashankar, R. (2022). Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction Effects in Integrated Retaining Wall-Building System. In Geohazard Mitigation (pp. 403-413). Springer, Singapore.
7. Al-Farhan, Z. F., Al-Obaydi, M. A., & Al-Saffar, Q. N. (2022). Tunnel-Soil-Structure Interaction Under Seismic Load. In Geotechnical Engineering and Sustainable Construction (pp. 91-102). Springer, Singapore.
8. Araz, O., Ozturk, K. F., & Cakir, T. (2022). Effect of different objective functions on control performance of tuned mass damper for a high-rise building considering soil–structure interaction. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1-17.
9. Zhang, X., & Far, H. (2022). Seismic Behaviour of High-rise Frame-core Tube Structures Considering Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 5073–5105
10. Wu, K., Ma, J., Chuai, M., Li, C. H., Chen, Y., & Lv, F. (2022). Numerical simulation of the near-fault spontaneous rupture and its influence on dynamic soil-structure interaction. In Structures (Vol. 38, pp. 808-819). Elsevier.
11. Hakeem, I. Y., Agwa, I. S., Tayeh, B. A., & Abd-Elrahman, M. H. (2022). Effect of using a combination of rice husk and olive waste ashes on high-strength concrete properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01486.
12. Meghdadaian, M., & Ghalehnovi, M. (2019). Improving seismic performance of composite steel plate shear walls containing openings. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.001
13. Jahami, A., Temsah, Y., & Khatib, J. (2019). The efficiency of using CFRP as a strengthening technique for reinforced concrete beams subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 11(4), 411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40091-019-00242-w.
14. Jahami, A., Temsah, Y., Khatib, J., Baalbaki, O., Kenai, S. (2021). The behaviour of CFRP strengthened RC beams subjected to blast loading. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 103(3). Article No. 10309. DOI: 10.34910/MCE.103.9.
15. Bawab, J., Khatib, J., Jahami, A., Elkordi, A., Ghorbel, E. (2021). Structural Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams Incorporating Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Glass Waste. Buildings. 11(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11020067
16. Long, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Zhuang, H., Chen, W., & Peng, C. (2021). Nonlinear study on the structure-soil-structure interaction of seismic response among high-rise buildings. Engineering Structures, 242, 112550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112550.
17. Pan, H., Li, C., & Tian, L. (2021). Seismic fragility analysis of transmission towers considering effects of soil-structure interaction and depth-varying ground motion inputs. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(11), 4311-4337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01124-x.
18. Al Agha, W., Almorad, W. A., Umamaheswari, N., & Alhelwani, A. (2021). Study the seismic response of reinforced concrete high-rise building with dual framed-shear wall system considering the effect of soil structure interaction. Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 2182-2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.111.
19. Ding, H., Kaup, A., Wang, J. T., Lu, L. Q., & Altay, O. (2021). Real-time hybrid simulation framework for the investigation of soil-structure interaction effects on the vibration control performance of shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures, 243, 112621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112621.
20. Kant, R., Al Agha, W., Almorad, W. A., Thakur, M. S., & Umamaheswari, N. (2022). Study on seismic performance of reinforced concrete multi-storey building considering soil-structure interaction effect. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 2158-2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.475.
21. Firoj, M., Bahuguna, A., Kanth, A., & Agrahari, R. (2022). Effect of nonlinear soil− structure interaction and lateral stiffness on seismic performance of mid− rise RC building. Journal of Building Engineering, 59, 105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105096.
22. Li, J., Zhou, L., Li, S., Lin, G., & Ding, Z. (2023). Soil–structure interaction analysis of nuclear power plant considering three-dimensional surface topographic irregularities based on automatic octree mesh. Engineering Structures, 275, 115161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115161.
23. Bahuguna, A., & Firoj, M. (2022, October). Numerical simulation of seismic response of Slope–Foundation–Structure interaction for mid–rise RC buildings at various locations. In Structures (Vol. 44, pp. 343-356). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.011.