Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science

banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner
banner

ROLL DYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS APPROACH OF DECAY TEST USing THE GENERALIZED REDUCED GRADIENT METHOD (GRG)


DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-40421 
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Creative Commons License

Volume 21 article 1091 pages: 470-480

Hasanudin
PhD Student of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya City, East Java, Indonesia

Achmad Zubaydi*
Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya City, East Java, Indonesia

Wasis Dwi Aryawa
Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya City, East Java, Indonesia

Sea transportation is the vehicle which dominant and vital in the world. The increasing number of ships, types, and uncertain climate change have caused many ship accidents that have caused loss of life and property. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) issued the latest regulation on the second generation of ship stability criteria based on the dynamic of ship roll motions. The survival of dynamic stability depends on the hydrodynamic coefficients, which numerical and experimental calculations can obtain. The problem is finding the hydrodynamic coefficients of the ship roll quickly and accurately from the experimental roll decay data. This paper uses the Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) optimization to find the roll motion coefficient with the objective function of a standard deviation. The results show that the roll decay experiment graph is close optimization for variations of the minimum standard deviation used: all data, maximum-minimum amplitude, maximum amplitude, and minimum amplitude. The most similar chart to the experiment is optimization using a standard deviation of maximum-minimum amplitude with the optimal objective function σ = 1.006776 closest σ=1; obtained variable x_1=k_44=0.1087688 m; x_2=B_44=3.00306E-05 m-ton-sec. Based on sensitivity tests for various scenarios, optimization with a standard deviation of maximum amplitude has a high sensitivity, so it is necessary to avoid or be careful in its use. Generally, the GRG optimization method has the advantage of finding the hydrodynamic roll coefficient quickly and accurately.

View article

We acknowledge the Directorate of Research and Community Service-ITS, which has provided financial support. Furthermore, Alaik Nur Wahyudi-Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) helped provide data on the RoPax ship. Furthermore, the Flume Tank Laboratory of the Ocean Engineering Department-ITS conducted ship model experiments.

  1. L. Sciberras and J. R. Silva, “The UN’s 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the maritime transport domain: the role and challenges of IMO and its stakeholders through a grounded theory perspective,” WMU J Marit Affairs, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 435–459, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13437-018-0147-2.
  2. T. R. Walker et al., “Chapter 27 - Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation,” in World Seas: an Environmental Evaluation (Second Edition), C. Sheppard, Ed. Academic Press, 2019, pp. 505–530. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128050521000309
  3. Z. Zhang and X.-M. Li, “Global ship accidents and ocean swell-related sea states.,” Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, vol. 17, no. 11, 2017.
  4. H. Hasanudin, A. Zubaydi, and W. D. Aryawan, “Stability Assessments of RoPax Open Car Deck on Longitudinal Wave,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 012031, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012031.
  5. N. Baird, “Fatal ferry accidents, their causes, and how to prevent them,” (Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Jan. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/498
  6. H. Kim, S. Haugen, and I. B. Utne, “Assessment of accident theories for major accidents focusing on the MV SEWOL disaster: Similarities, differences, and discussion for a combined approach,” Safety science, vol. 82, pp. 410–420, 2016.
  7. A. Christodoulou, Z. Raza, and J. Woxenius, “The integration of RoRo shipping in sustainable intermodal transport chains: The case of a North European RoRo service,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 2422, 2019.
  8. K. Formela, T. Neumann, and A. Weintrit, “Overview of Definitions of Maritime Safety, Safety at Sea, Navigational Safety and Safety in General,” TransNav, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 285–290, 2019, doi: 10.12716/1001.13.02.03.
  9. P. R. Alman, “Thoughts on Integrating Stability into Risk Based Methods for Naval Ship Design,” in Contemporary Ideas on Ship Stability, vol. 119, V. L. Belenky, K. J. Spyrou, F. van Walree, M. Almeida Santos Neves, and N. Umeda, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 927–944. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00516-0_55.
  10. Y. Yang, B. Zhang, C. Zeng, X. Lu, and S. Chen, “Review of Research Status and Development of Paralysis Ship Stability Criteria,” International Journal of Science, vol. 7 No.6, 2020.
  11. J. Rahola, The Judging of the Stability of Ships and the Determination of the Minimum Amount of Stability–Especially Considering the Vessels Navigating Finnish Waters. Aalto University, 1939.
  12. P. Ruponen, “Rahola criterion revisited: an overview of Jaakko Rahola’s research and career,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Ship Stability Workshop ISSW2019, Helsinki, Finland, 2019, pp. 15–20.
  13. D. Paroka and S. Asri, “Alternative Assessment of Weather Criterion For Ships With Large Breadth And Draught Ratios By A Model Experiment: A Case Study On An Indonesian RO-RO Ferry,” International Journal of Maritime Engineering, vol. 162, no. A1, Art. no. A1, 2020.
  14. A. Ariffin, S. Mansor, and J.-M. Laurens, “A Numerical Study for Level 1 Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria,” 2015, pp. 183–193.
  15. A. Francescutto, “Intact stability criteria of ships – Past, present and future,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 120, pp. 312–317, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.030.
  16. W. Peters and V. Belenky, “Regulatory Aspects of Implementation of IMO second generation intact stability criteria,” 2016, pp. 13–15.
  17. N. Petacco and P. Gualeni, “IMO Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria: General Overview and Focus on Operational Measures,” JMSE, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 494, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.3390/jmse8070494.
  18. J. Lister, “Green Shipping: Governing Sustainable Maritime Transport,” Global Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 118–129, May 2015, doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12180.
  19. P. IMO, “Background of criteria regarding righting lever curve properties (part A of the 2008 IS Code),” 2008. https://www.imorules.com/GUID-E8AD1425-5B54-4291-AF02-184A91FE1C2B.html (accessed Jul. 19, 2022).
  20. T. Kubo, N. Umeda, S. Izawa, and A. Matsuda, “Total Stability Failure Probability of a Ship in Beam Wind and Waves: Model Experiment and Numerical Simulation,” in Contemporary Ideas on Ship Stability, vol. 119, V. L. Belenky, K. J. Spyrou, F. van Walree, M. Almeida Santos Neves, and N. Umeda, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 591–603. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00516-0_35.
  21. C. A. Rodríguez, I. S. Ramos, P. T. Esperança, and M. C. Oliveira, “Realistic estimation of roll damping coefficients in waves based on model tests and numerical simulations,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 213, p. 107664, 2020.
  22. C.-J. Söder, A. Rosén, S. Werner, M. Huss, and J. Kuttenkeuler, “Assessment of Ship Roll Damping Through Full Scale and Model Scale Experiments and Semi-empirical Methods,” in Contemporary Ideas on Ship Stability, vol. 119, V. L. Belenky, K. J. Spyrou, F. van Walree, M. Almeida Santos Neves, and N. Umeda, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 177–190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00516-0_10.
  23. ITTC, “ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Procedure Model Tests on Intact Stability.” International Towing Tank Conference, 2008.
  24. M. Gu, J. Lu, S. Bu, C. Wu, and G. Qiu, “Numerical simulation of the ship roll damping,” Proceedings of STAB, pp. 341–348, 2015.
  25. A. Oliva-Remola and L. Pérez-Rojas, “A step forward towards developing an uncertainty analysis procedure for roll decay tests,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Ship Stability Workshop, Helsinki, 2019.
  26. S. Dissanayake and T. Rupasinghe, “Warehouse Optimization using Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRC) Method,” in 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (Singapore), 2021, pp. 1–12.
  27. R. Subramanian and P. V. Jyothish, “Genetic algorithm based design optimization of a passive anti-roll tank in a sea going vessel,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 203, p. 107216, 2020.
  28. A. Msabawy and F. Mohammad, “Continuous sizing optimization of cold-formed steel portal frames with semi-rigid joints using generalized reduced gradient algorithm,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 42, pp. 2290–2300, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.318.
  29. M. N. Nawaz et al., “Cost-Based Optimization of Isolated Footing in Cohesive Soils Using Generalized Reduced Gradient Method,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1646, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12101646.
  30. M. Jalal and M. Goharzay, “Cuckoo search algorithm for applied structural and design optimization: Float system for experimental setups,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 159–172, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcde.2018.07.001.
  31. J. Lu, M. Gu, and E. Boulougouris, “Model experiments and direct stability assessments on pure loss of stability in stern quartering waves,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 216, p. 108035, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108035.
  32. C. A. Rodríguez and M. A. S. Neves, “Investigation on Parametrically Excited Motions of Spar Platforms in Waves,” in Contemporary Ideas on Ship Stability, vol. 119, V. L. Belenky, K. J. Spyrou, F. van Walree, M. Almeida Santos Neves, and N. Umeda, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 291–305. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00516-0_17.
  33. E. Uzunoglu and C. Guedes Soares, “Automated processing of free roll decay experimental data,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 102, pp. 17–26, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.016.
  34. V. Belenky and N. B. Sevastianov, Stability And Safety of Ships Risk of Capsizing, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME)., vol. Second Edition. 2007.
  35. R. Bhattacharyya, Dynamics of marine vehicles. Wiley Series in Computing, 1978.
  36. C. Walha and A. M. Alimi, “Human-like modeling and generation of grasping motion using multi-objective particle swarm optimization approach,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 694, 2016.
  37. R. Y. M. Li and A. Chan, “Reits Portfolio Optimization: A Nonlinear Generalized Reduced Gradient Approach,” in International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, 2018, pp. 216–223.
  38. R. S. Correia, G. F. F. Bono, and G. Bono, “Optimization of reinforced concrete beams using Solver tool,” Rev. IBRACON Estrut. Mater., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 910–931, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1590/s1983-41952019000400011.