DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-45719
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 22 article 1181 pages: 223-233
Kendal Regency has problems with passenger bus station services in the transportation sector. Integrating components in Sukorejo Type B Bus Station includes crossing circulation patterns between people and vehicles. The crossing can cause conflicts that endanger the safety of service users. This study aimed to handle circulation conflicts through the integration of the components applied in the Sukorejo Type B Bus Station can be optimal. This study used a methodological approach such as quantitative, explanation, and planning, referring to the field results and observational surveys. This research used 135 respondents of inter-city transportation within the province (AKDP) and 147 respondents of rural transportation (ANGDES). The results showed the integration performance between the components of the Sukorejo Type B Bus Station through the Normalized Score, which got a value of -100 with good information and indicated by the total circulation distance needed to reach each bus station component in 452 meters for 342 seconds. In Bus Station Type B Sukorejo, circulation crossings caused conflict at as many as 10 points due to the pedestrian crossing activities in private vehicle parking, arrival areas, waiting areas, and public transport departures. The research value of PV2 < 108 meant the need for pedestrian facilities indicated that it was not necessary to handle circulation crossings with pedestrian facilities. It was just sufficient to provide pedestrian warning signs to cross, so that vehicle drivers could be careful in crossing each conflict point.
1.
Z. R. N, S. Handayani, and R. R. P,
“PERENCANAAN ANGKUTAN WISATA DI KOTA PADANG,” 2019.
2. H. Azwansyah and F.
Juniardi, “Pemetaan Sistem Informasi Infrastruktur Transportrasi Di Kabupaten Ketapang,”
2014.
3.
S.
Tadić, M. Krstić, V. Roso, and N. Brnjac, “Planning an intermodal terminal for
the sustainable transport networks,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 15, 2019,
doi: 10.3390/su11154102.
4.
M.
Syarif, V. Sampebulu, M. W. Tjaronge, and N. Junus, “SUBTITUSI SAMPAH ORGANIK
DAN TANAH MEDITERAN MENJADI SEMEN ALTERNATIF SELAIN SEMEN PORTLAND,” J.
Teknosains, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 119, Sep. 2018, doi:
10.22146/teknosains.33708.
5.
J.
Hutasuhut, U. Muslim, N. Al, and W. Abstrak, “PENGARUH KOMPETENSI TERHADAP
KINERJA KARYAWAN (Studi Kasus Pada PT PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA IV (Persero) Kantor
Pusat Medan),” Mei, 2016. [Online]. Available:
http://economy.okezone.com/read/2011/04/
6.
A. J.
Horowitz and N. A. Thompson, “Evaluation of Intermodal Passenger Transfer
Facilities Final Report,” 1994.
7.
A. N.
A. Dina and W. Setiawan, “EVALUASI PURNA HUNI SIRKULASI DAN FASILITAS TERMINAL
KARTASURA,” 2014.
8.
E.
Falyntina, Widorisnomo, and A. Ronaldo, “PENATAAN INTEGRASI FISIK ANTARA
STASIUN TANJUNG KARANG DAN TERMINAL PASAR BAWAH DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG EVA
FALYNTINA WIDORISNOMO AJI RONALDO,” 2020.
9.
D.
Williamsson and U. Sellgren, “An Approach to Integrated Modularization,” Procedia
CIRP, vol. 50, pp. 613–617, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.152.
10.
J.
Gausemeier, T. Gaukstern, and C. Tschirner, “Systems engineering management
based on a discipline-spanning system model,” Procedia Comput. Sci.,
vol. 16, pp. 303–312, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.032.
11.
Y.
Gusleni, Listantari, and D. P. Nugroho, “Evaluasi Integrasi Fasilitas Alih Moda
Pada Simpul Transportasi di Perkotaan Yogyakarta,” vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 17–24,
2021.
12.
H.
Juniati, “Integrasi Pelabuhan Benoa dan Trans Sarbagita dalam Rangka
Peningkatan Pelayanan Transportasi Perkotaan di Denpasar Bali,” J. Transp.
Multimoda, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 42–16, 2019.
13.
N. M.
Noh, D. Mohamad, and A. H. A. Hamid, “Acceptable walking distance accessible to
the nearest bus stop considering the service coverage,” in 2021
International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering, ICOTEN 2021,
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Jul. 2021. doi:
10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493435.
14.
K.
Fang and S. Zimmerman, “Public Transport Service Optimization and System
Integration,” China Transp. Top., vol. 14, no. 14, 2015, [Online].
Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/23489
15.
A.
Munandar and A. Kurniawan, “PENUMPANG TIPE A KABUPATEN KEBUMEN,” 2020.
16.
C. T.
S. Kandou, S. V Pandey, and O. H. Kaseke, “PERENCANAAN TERMINAL PENUMPANG
ANGKUTAN JALAN TIPE B DI KECAMATAN TOMOHON SELATAN KOTA TOMOHON,” J. Sipil
Statik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2019.
17.
P.
Juanita Romadhona, P. Badan Litbang Perhubungan Jl Merdeka Timur No, and J.
Pusat, “ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN FASILITAS INTEGRASI ANTARMODA DALAM UPAYA
PENINGKATAN PELAYANAN DI STASilJN TUGU YOGYAKARTA Sri Lestari *),” 2010.
18.
Afkar,
L. B. Said, and S. M. H, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fungsi Transit pada
Terminal Metro Makassar Berdasarkan Persepsi Pengguna,” 2021.
19.
M.
Andini, B. S. Waloejo, and S. Hariyani, “EVALUASI KINERJA TERMINAL BAYUANGGA
KOTA PROBOLINGGO,” 2021.
20.
N.
Tanan, “Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki,” 2011.
21.
W. J.
Pienaar, “THE ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BUS AND MINIBUS TAXI TERMINALS AND
TRANSFER FACILITIES by,” 1998.
22.
Departemen
Pekerjaan Umum, “Tata Cara Perencanaan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Di Kawasan
Perkotaan,” p. 21, 1995.
23.
D. A.
Afrianti, V. S. Dinda, and S. Susanti, “Integrasi Fasilitas Pelayanan Pada
Pelabuhan Sekupang Kota Batam,” J. Transp. Multimoda, vol. 19, no. 1,
pp. 20–31, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.25104/mtm.v19i1.1857.
24.
Menteri
Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik
Indonesia Nomor PM 40 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Penyelenggaraan Terminal
Penumpang Angkutan Jalan,” pp. 1–21, 2015.
25.
G.
Nursetyo, “KAJIAN MANAJEMEN SIRKULASI TERMINAL BUS ( Studi Kasus : Terminal Bus
Tirtonadi Surakarta ),” 2016.
26.
A.
Tank, “Discovering Interactions in Multivariate Time Series,” 2018.