Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privreduJournal of Applied Engineering Science

SIMULATION MODELing OF LOGGing HARVESTER MOVEMENTS DURing SELECTIVE LOGGing


DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-50146 
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Creative Commons License

Volume 22 article 1225 pages: 604-611

Konstantin Rukomojnikov*
Volga State University of Technology, Institute of Forestry and Nature Management, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia

Tatiana Sergeeva
Volga State University of Technology, Institute of Forestry and Nature Management, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia

The purpose of this research is to substantiate the mathematical regularities of the harvester operation, allowing for rapid technical calculations of labor costs with a sufficient level of reliability when performing various logging operations. The article describes the simulation model of harvester movement in the cutting area, created by the authors to analyze the operation of the harvester at various logging sites. Examples of visualization of the program and the results obtained with its use are given. Four-factor experimental plan was drawn up with varying factors at four levels. The results obtained during the simulation have been statistically processed. The analyzed elements of the cycle time are: the average time of pointing the manipulator at a tree, the average time of moving a fallen tree to the processing zone and the average time of moving the harvester between working positions per felled tree. The regression dependencies obtained as a result of the analysis are based on four indicators. Such indicators are: the total stock of wood per hectare, the share of the felled component of the stand, the amount of undergrowth (rowan, bird cherry, willow, etc.) in the cutting area, the average volume of the tree in the cutting area. The found patterns give the researcher a general idea of the effectiveness of the equipment in specific natural conditions of cutting areas. The use of the acquired knowledge in the analysis of harvester performance will improve the accuracy of planning the work of logging crews.

View article

The study was supported by the grant the Russian Science Foundation № 24-26-00129, https://rscf.ru/project/24-26-00129/

1.      Eriksson, M., Lindroos, O. (2014). Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets, International Journal of Forest Engineering, 25:3, pp. 179-200, DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2014.974309

2.      Mokhirev, A.P, Kunitskaya, O. A., Kalita, G.A., Verner, N.N., Shvetsova, V.V. (2022). Logging harvester reliability assessment. Forestry Bulletin, V.26, № 5, pp. 93-101. – DOI 10.18698/2542-1468-2022-5-93-101.

3.      Rukomojnikov, K., Vedernikov, S., Gabdrahmanov, M. (2018). A method for delimbing tree-trunks and a device for applying the method. Journal of Applied Engineering Science. Vol. 16, No. 2. – P. 263-266. – DOI 10.5937/jaes16-16442.

4.      Zyryanov, M.A., Saltanov, A.G., Davydenko, A.N. (2021). Main trends in the design of forest machinery in conditions of improving technological processes. Science and business: development ways, № 5(119), pp. 48-54.

5.      Bolshakov, B., Andrushin, M., Doronicheva, E. (2019). The development of technology and machines when thinning the forest in Finland and Sweden. Forestry information, № 2, pp.111-128. – DOI 10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2019.2.11.

6.      Gellerstedt, S., Dahlin, B. (1999) Cut-to-length: The next decade. Journal of Forest Engineering, 10(2), pp.17-25.

7.      Mokhirev, A. P., Rukomoinikov, K. P. (2022). Modeling the structure of timber transport flows. Yoshkar-Ola: Volga State University of Technology, 396 p. – ISBN 978-5-8158-2263-4.

8.      Savenkov, D., Savenkova, N., Derbin, M., Tret'yakov, A. (2020). Rotary replacement of saw chains as a way to increase harvester productivity. Forestry engineering journal, V.10, № 2(38), pp.196-203. – DOI 10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2020.2/20.

9.      Savinykh, T.I., Savinykh, M.A., Yakimovich, S.B. (2021). Comparative analysis of methods of harvesting wood by harvester according to the criterion of productivity and specific energy intensity. Forests of Russia and economy in them, № 4(79), pp.69-74. – DOI 10.51318/FRET.2021.95.37.006.

10.   Spinelli, R., Owende, P., Ward, S.M. (2002). Productivity and cost of CTL harvesting of Eucalyptus globulus stands using excavator-based harvesters. For. Prod. J., 52(1) pp.67-77.

11.   Chiorescu, S., Gronlund, A. (2001). Assessing the role of the harvester within the forestry-wood chain. For. Prod. J., 51(2), pp.77-84.

12.   Talbot, B., Nordfjell, T., Suadicani, K. (2003). Assessing the utility of two integrated harvester-forwarder machine concepts through stand-level simulation. Int. J. For. Eng, 14(2), pp.31-43.

13.   Wester, F., Eliasson, L. (2003). Productivity in final felling and thinning for a combined harvester-forwarder (Harwarder). Int. J. For. Eng., 14(2), pp.45-50.

14.   Conradie, I.P., Greene, W.D., Murphy, G.E. (2003). Value recovery with harvesters in southeastern USA pine stands. 2nd forest Engineering Conference. 12-15 May, pp. 55-63.

15.   Greene, W.D., Jackson, B.D., Culpepper, J.D. (2001). Georgia's logging businesses, 1987 to 1997. For. Prod. J., 51(1), pp.25-28.

16.   Piskunov, M.A. (2020). Features of the harvesting and logging equipment market in Russia. Russian Forestry Journal, № 6(378), pp.132-147. – DOI 10.37482/0536-1036-2020-6-132-147.

17.   Piskunov, M.A. (2020). Research on the price of harvesters in the secondary market as an aspect of changing their technical condition. Tractors and agricultural machinery, №5, pp.37-44. – DOI 10.31992/0321-4443-2020-5-37-44.

18.   Mokhirev, A., Rukomojnikov, K., Gerasimova, M., Medvedev, S. (2021). Design of logging infrastructure in consideration of the dynamically changing environment. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. Vol. 49, No. 3. – P. 254-266. – DOI 10.5658/WOOD.2021.49.3.254.

19.   Mokhirev, A.P. (2016). Method of selection of forest machines under the climatic conditions. Forestry engineering journal, V. 6, № 4(24), pp.208-215. – DOI 10.12737/23459.

20.   Rukomoinikov, K. P. (2016). The choice of rational technology and justification of parameters of the quarterly development of forest areas, Yoshkar-Ola: Volga State University of Technology – 296 p. – ISBN 978-5-8158-1672-5.

21.   National Simulation Society, http://simulation.su/ru.html (date of the application: 16.02.2024).

22.   Boero, R., Morini, M., Sonnessa, M., Terna, P. (2015). Agent-based models of the Economy: from theories to applications. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 232 p.

23.   AnyLogic URL: https://www.anylogic.ru/ (date of the application: 16.02.2024).

24.   Rukomojnikov, K.P., Sergeeva, T.V., Gilyazova, T.A., Voldaev, M.N., Tsarev, E.M., Anisimov, S.E. (2022). Computer simulation of the development of logging sites using a felling-delimbing bucker. Systems. Methods. Technologies, № 2(54), pp. 108-113. – DOI 10.18324/2077-5415-2022-2-108-113 (in Russian).

25.   Rukomoynikov, K. P., Sergeeva, T. V., Gilyazova, T. A., Komisar, V.P. (2022). Computer modeling to support management and organizational decisions in the use of a forest harvester. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Dushanbe, 21–23 December 2021, Dushanbe, P. 122510P. – DOI 10.1117/12.2631137.

26.   Rukomoynikov, K. P., Sergeeva, T. V., Gilyazova, T. A., Tsarev, E.M., Anisimov, S.E., Komisar, V.P. (2022). Harvester Simulation Program. Certificate of state registration of the computer program, no. 2022614531, Russian Federation.

27.   Rukomoynikov, K.P., Sergeeva, T.V., Gilyazova, T.A., Tsarev, E.M., Anisimov, P.N. (2023). Modeling operation of forest harvester in AnyLogic simulation system. Lesnoy vestnik. Forestry Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 69–80. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2023-3-69-80

28.   Kunitskaya, O.A., Chernutskii, N.A., Derbin, M.V., Rudov, S.E., Grigor'ev, I.V., Grigoreva, O.I. (2019). Machine harvesting of wood according to Scandinavian technology. St. Petersburg: Publishing and Printing Association of Higher Educational Institutions, 192 p.

29.   Laptev, A. V., Makarenko, A. V., Bykovsky, M. A. (2015). Determination of the zone of effective work of the multi-operational logging machine of the manipulator type. Scientific and technical bulletin of the Volga region. № 6. – pp. 170-172.

30.   Crow, E.L., Davis, F.A., Maxfield, M.W. (2011). Statistics Manual (Dover Books on Mathematics). Dover Publications, 2011, 320 p.

31.   Peck, R., Olsen, C., Devore, J. (2016). Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis. Edition 5., Cengage Learning, 885 p.

32.   Chayka, O.R., Fokin, N.S. (2018). Simulation algorithm of parameters of forest plantations// Repair, Reconditioning, Modernization, № 12, pp. 41-43. DOI 10.31044/1684-2561-2018-0-12-41-43.

33.   Chernik, D.V., Kazantsev, R.V. (2020). Imitational physical modeling of a universal forestry machine. Conifers of the boreal area, V.38, № 3-4, pp.183-188.

34.   Eliasson, L. (1998). Simulation of thinning with a single-grip harvester. For. Sci., 45 (1), pp.26-34.

35.   Wang, J., Ledoux, C.B., LI Y. (2005). Simulating Cut-to-Length Harvesting Operations in Appalachian Hardwoods. International Journal of Forest Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 11–27. DOI: https: //doi.org/ 10.1080/14942119.2005.10702510.

36.   Chayka, O.R., Mikheyev, K.P. (2019). Simulation algorithm for gripping and cutting of trees by harvester in case of incompleted forest felling. Repair, Reconditioning, Modernization, № 12, pp. 30-33. – DOI 10.31044/1684-2561-2019-0-12-30-33.

37.   Sängstuvall, L., Bergström, D., Lämås, T., Nordfjell, T. (2012). Simulation of harvester productivity in selective and boom-corridor thinning of young forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Volume: 27, Number: 1, pp 56-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.628335.

38.   Shirnin, YU.A., Onuchin, E. M. (2003). Simulation modeling of the movement of a multi-operational forest machine. Russian Forestry Journal, № 4. pp. 66-72.

39.   Wang, J., Ledoux, C.B. (2003). Estimating and validating ground-based timber harvesting production through computer simulation. For. Sci., 49(1), pp.64-76.

40.   Hartsough, B.R., Zhang, X., Fight, R.D. (2001). Harvesting cost model for small trees in natural stands in the interior northwest. For. Prod. J., 51(4), pp.54-60.

41.   Mcneel, J., Rutherford, D. (1994). Modeling harvester-forwarder system performance in a selection harvest. J. For. Eng., 6(1), pp.7-14.

42.   Yaoxiang, Li (2005). Modeling operational forestry problems in central Appalachian hardwood forests. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4166. https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.4166 Режим доступа: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4166

43.   Lindroos, O. (2008). The Effects of Increased Mechanization on Time Consumption in Small- Scale Firewood Processing. Silva Fennica, 42(5), 791-805.

44.   Lindroos, O., Bergström, D., Johansson, P., Nordfjell, T. (2008). Cutting corners with a new crane concept. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 19(2), 21-27.

45.   Borodin, V., Hnaien, F., Labadie, N., Bourtembourg, J. (2013). A discrete event simulation model for harvest operations under stochastic conditions// 2013 10th IEEE International conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC), Evry, France, pp. 708-713, doi: 10.1109/ICNSC.2013.6548825.

46.   Sokolov, A., Osipov, E. (2018). Substantiation of the technology of wood harvesting with the help of imitation modeling on petri net. Forestry engineering journal, V.8, № 1(29), pp.111-119. – DOI 10.12737/article_5ab0dfc0247508.69266095.

47.   Gerasimov, YU., Davydkov, G.A., Kilpelainen, S.A., Sokolov, A.P., Syunyov, V.S. (2003). Prospects of Applying New Information Technologies in Forest Complex. News of higher educational institutions. Forestry Journal, № 5, pp. 122–129.

48.   Rukomojnikov, K.P. (2013). Simulation modeling of mutually coordinated operation of sets of adaptive-modular forest machines. Forestry Bulletin, No. 3, pp. 154–158.

49.   Sokolov, A.P., Osipov, E.V. (2017). Simulation modeling of the production process of wood harvesting using Petri nets. Forestry Journal, vol. 7, № 3 (27), pp. 307–314. DOI: 10.12737/article_59c2140d704ae5.63513712

50.   Wang, J., Greene, W.D. (1999). An interactive simulation system for modeling stands, harvests, and machines. J. For. Eng. 10(1): 81-89.

51.   Patyakin, V.I., Grigoriev, I.V. (2012). Technology and machines of logging operations. Saint Petersburg: S.M. Kirov, SPbFTU, 362 p. – ISBN 978-5-9239-0468-0

52.   Shirnin, YU. A. (2004). Technology and equipment of timber industries. Part 1. – Moscow: MGUL, 446 p.

53.   Azarenok, V. A., Hertz, E. F., Mehrentsev, A.V. (2001). Sorting logging: a textbook for universities. Ural State Forest Engineering Academy. – Yekaterinburg: USFTA – 134 с. – ISBN 5-230-25652-4.

54.   Bazarov, S.M., Belenkii, YU.I., Svoikin, F.V., Svoikin,V.F., Balde, T.M.D. (2020). System analysis of the wheel forwarder’s technological efficiency on the unloading operation. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii. Volume 233, pp. 177–188 (in Russian with English summary). DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2020.233.177-188

55.   Shegelman, I.R., Skrypnik, V.I., Galaktionov, O.N. (2005). Technical equipment of modern logging. St. Petersburg: PROFI-INFORM, 344 p.