DOI: 10.5937/jaes10-2131
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 terms and conditions.
Volume 10 article 227 pages: 99 - 105
Maintenance Management requires acceptance of basic
systems approach, i.e. implementation of company goals to management goals.
Well know Maintenance management philosophies (TPM, RCM, RBI) applied in order
to improve processes, often remain only on the basis of the implementation of
services without the need for full integration into existing management
systems. Misunderstanding the nature of maintenance management leads to
inefficient step, resulting in a contradiction between the goals of management
and their ability to support real goals through maintenance management. Process
approach in the management of maintenance is the basis for improvement in
maintenance and hence achieving the required performance. KPI indicators must
fulfill the criteria of accuracy and efficiency of measurement by process
owners, otherwise it lead to disinformation, which results are poor management
decisions, and thus a threat of requirements for continuous improvement.This
article, based on practical experience, analyzes the root errors caused by
maintenance management in order to apply the selected philosophy in the
management of maintenance without the knowledge or lack of willingness to
accept a systemic approach to maintenance management.
This
research has been supported by the grant of Ministry of Ministry of Education,
Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic „ Research centre of the
science of integration system conjunction of renewable energy sources -
VUKONZE”, ITMS 26220120064.
Batalovic V., Danilovic D., Zivkovic M., Model od oil and gas pipeline rinsing using the fluid flow, Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 9(2011)1, p.237-242
DHILLON, B.,S, (2008) Mining Equipment Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, Springler, USA, pp.115 - 124, ISBN 978-1-§84800-287-6.
EN 13 306: 2001 Maintenance terminology. Bratislava: vyd. SUTN, 2006, 55pp.
Nenadal J, and col., Modern Quality Management. Management Press, Praha 2008, pp. 377, ISBN 978-80-7261-186-7.
Pacaiova H, Kacvinsky S, Grencik J (2011) Trends in Maintenance in Automotive industry. In: DIAGO 2011 : Technicka diagnostika stroju a vyrobnich zarizeni : 1.- 2.2.2011, Roznov pod Radhost’em. - VSB TU Ostrava, 2011, pp. 226- 232, ISSN 1210 - 311X.
Pacaiova H, Nagyova A, Namesanska J. (2011) Advantages and Disadvantages of KPI in Risk Management Process. In: 3rd iN- Teg-Risk Conference & 20th SRA - Europe Meeting : book of abstracts : Stuttgart, 6-8 June 2011. - Stuttgart : Steinbeis-Edition, 2011, pp. 38. ISBN 978-3-941417-65-6.
Pacaiova H, Sinay J, Glatz J, (2009) Safety and risk of technical systems. SjF TU of Kosice, 2009. 246 pp. ISBN978-80-553-0180-8
Pacaiova H, Sinay J, Kacvinsky S (2010) Maintenance control and risk management. In: Reliability, Risk and Safety: back to the future : ESREL 2010 : European Safety and Reliability Conference : 5 - 9 september 2010, Rhodes, Greece. - London: Taylor & Francis, 2010, pp. 1474-1480. ISBN 978-0-415-60427-7.
Rakyta M, (2010) Total productive maintenance, system for assure performance, quality and safety, RlZENl A UDRZBA prumysloveho podniku, internet: http://udrzbapodniku.cz/index.php?id=47&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=3586&tx_ttnews[backPid]= 1261&cHash=e3ce3b239c.
Shah M, Littlefield M,(2009) Asset Performance
Management, November 2009, Aberdeen Group.