DOI: 10.5937/jaes0-34023
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0
Volume 20 article 953 pages: 464-476
The rapid growth in population and the increase in the number of vehicles on the road have resulted in severe traffic congestion over the last two decades. However, intersections, where different flows intersect, are among the major cause of traffic congestion besides bottlenecks. Past decades have seen major technological advancements in road vehicles aimed at making vehicles traveling securely and comfortably. Current connected and automated vehicles (CAV) are packed with lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control to ensure that vehicles do not collide and reduce traffic congestion. In this research, we developed a control algorithm that utilizes CAVs to help generate additional usable gaps for the minor road vehicles to enter the intersection without affecting the mainline traffic flow. Simulation results showed that the delay and queue length of the minor road approach is minimized without causing a significant delay to the mainline. The minor road delay was reduced by 72% when the percentage of CAVs on the major road is 70% compared to the benchmark with no CAVs on the major road.
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from Jouf University for paying the publication fee of this manuscript
1. Namazi, E., Li, J., & Lu, C. (2019). Intelligent intersection management systems considering autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, vol. 7, 91946-91965.
2. Deng, Z., Shi, Y., Han, Q., Lv, L., & Shen, W. (2020). A Conflict Duration Graph-Based Coordination Method for Connected and Automated Vehicles at Signal-Free Intersections. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 18, 6223.
3. Filocamo, B., Ruiz, J. A., & Sotelo, M. A. (2020). Efficient management of road intersections for automated vehicles—The FRFP system applied to the various types of intersections and roundabouts. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, 316.
4. Pruekprasert, S., Zhang, X., Dubut, J., Huang, C., & Kishida, M. (2019). Decision making for autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersection in presence of malicious vehicles. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), 2019, pp. 2299-2304. IEEE.
5. Ahmed, A., Sadullah, A. F. M., & Yahya, A. S. (2016). Field study on the behavior of right-turning vehicles in Malaysia and their contribution on the safety of unsignalized intersections. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 42, 433-446.
6. Dissanayake, S., Lu, J. J., & Ping, Y. I. (2002). Driver age differences in day and night gap acceptance capabilities. Iatss research, vol. 26, no. 1, 71-79.
7. Datta, S. (2014). Modelling critical gaps for U-turn vehicles at median openings under Indian mixed traffic conditions (Doctoral dissertation).
8. Tupper, S. M., Knodler Jr, M. A., & Hurwitz, D. S. (2011). Connecting gap acceptance behavior with crash experience. In 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation Purdue University Transportation Research Board.
9. McGowen, P., & Stanley, L. (2012). Alternative methodology for determining gap acceptance for two-way stop-controlled intersections. Journal of transportation engineering, vol. 138, no. 5, 495-501.
10. Boon, M. A. A., Mandjes, M. R. H., & Núñez Queija, R. (2016). Congestion analysis of unsignalized intersections.
11. Wang, Y., Cai, P., & Lu, G. (2020). Cooperative autonomous traffic organization method for connected automated vehicles in multi-intersection road networks. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 111, 458-476.
12. Zhou, M., Qu, X., & Qi, W. (2021). Improving efficiency at highway T-junctions with connected and automated vehicles. Transportmetrica A: transport science, vol. 17, no. 1, 107-123.
13. Gao, K., Huang, S., Han, F., Li, S., Wu, W., & Du, R. (2020). An integrated algorithm for intersection queue length estimation based on IoT in a mixed traffic scenario. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 6, 2078.
14. Naumann, R., Rasche, R., Tacken, J., & Tahedi, C. (1997). Validation and simulation of a decentralized intersection collision avoidance algorithm. Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 818-823. IEEE.
15. Pan, T., Guo, R., Lam, W. H., Zhong, R., Wang, W., & He, B. (2021). Integrated optimal control strategies for freeway traffic mixed with connected automated vehicles: A model-based reinforcement learning approach. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, vol. 123, 102987.
16. Bashiri, M., Jafarzadeh, H., & Fleming, C. H. (2018). Paim: Platoon-based autonomous intersection management. 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018. pp. 374-380. IEEE.
17. Niels, T., Mitrovic, N., Dobrota, N., Bogenberger, K., Stevanovic, A., & Bertini, R. (2020). Simulation-based evaluation of a new integrated intersection control scheme for connected automated vehicles and pedestrians. Transportation research record, vol. 2674, no. 11, 779-793.
18. Zhang, H., Zhang, R., Chen, C., Duan, D., Cheng, X., & Yang, L. (2021). A Priority-Based Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) Scheme for Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs). Vehicles, vol. 3, no. 3, 533-544.
19. Dresner, K., & Stone, P. (2008). A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. Journal of artificial intelligence research, vol. 31, 591-656.
20. Lee, J., & Park, B. (2012). Development and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle intersection control algorithm under the connected vehicles environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, 81-90.
21. Jin, Q., Wu, G., Boriboonsomsin, K., & Barth, M. (2012, December). Multi-agent intersection management for connected vehicles using an optimal scheduling approach. International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE 2012), pp. 185-190. IEEE.
22. Zhu, F., & Ukkusuri, S. V. (2015). A linear programming formulation for autonomous intersection control within a dynamic traffic assignment and connected vehicle environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 55, 363-378
23. Sun, W., Zheng, J., & Liu, H. X. (2017). A capacity maximization scheme for intersection management with automated vehicles. Transportation research procedia, vol. 23, 121-136.
24. Kamal, M. A. S., Imura, J. I., Hayakawa, T., Ohata, A., & Aihara, K. (2014). A vehicle-intersection coordination scheme for smooth flows of traffic without using traffic lights. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, 1136-1147.
25. Mirheli, A., Hajibabai, L., & Hajbabaie, A. (2018). Development of a signal-head-free intersection control logic in a fully connected and autonomous vehicle environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 92, 412-425.
26. Kamal, M. A. S., Imura, J. I., Ohata, A., Hayakawa, T., & Aihara, K. (2013). Coordination of automated vehicles at a traffic-lightless intersection. 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2013, pp. 922-927. IEEE.
27. Wuthishuwong, C., & Traechtler, A. (2013). Vehicle to infrastructure based safe trajectory planning for Autonomous Intersection Management. 13th international conference on ITS telecommunications (ITST) 2013. pp. 175-180. IEEE.
28. Levin, M. W., & Rey, D. (2017). Conflict-point formulation of intersection control for autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 85, 528-547.
29. Fayazi, S. A., Vahidi, A., & Luckow, A. (2017). Optimal scheduling of autonomous vehicle arrivals at intelligent intersections via MILP. American control conference (ACC) 2017. pp. 4920-4925. IEEE.
30. Jin, Q., Wu, G., Boriboonsomsin, K., & Barth, M. (2012, December). Multi-agent intersection management for connected vehicles using an optimal scheduling approach. International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE) 2012, pp. 185-190. IEEE
31. Zhang, Y. J., Malikopoulos, A. A., & Cassandras, C. G. (2016). Optimal control and coordination of connected and automated vehicles at urban traffic intersections. American Control Conference (ACC) 2016, pp. 6227-6232. IEEE.
32. Ma, Q., Zhang, S., & Zhou, Q. (2021). Development of a conflict-free unsignalized intersection organization method for multiple connected and autonomous vehicles. Plos one, vol. 16, no. 3, e0249170.
33. Zhong, G., Zhang, J., Yin, T., & Nie, J. (2015). A Cooperative Management Strategy Designed for Unsignalized Intersections Under a Connected Vehicle Environment. CICTP 2015, pp. 233-245.
34. Chen, W., & Liu, Y. (2017). Gap-based automated vehicular speed guidance towards eco-driving at an unsignalized intersection. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics.
35. Weyland, C. M., Baumann, M. V., Buck, H. S., & Vortisch, P. (2021). Parameters Influencing Lane Flow Distribution on Multilane Freeways in PTV Vissim. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 184, 453-460.
36. Chen, C., Zhao, X., Liu, H., Ren, G., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. (2019). Assessing the influence of adverse weather on traffic flow characteristics using a driving simulator and VISSIM. Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, 830.
37. PTV AG. (2018). PTV Vissim 10 user manual. PTV AG: Karlsruhe, Germany.
38. Shaaban, K., & Hamad, H. (2020). Critical gap comparison between one-, two-, and three-lane roundabouts in Qatar. Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 10, 4232.
39. Čelar, N., Stanković, S., Kajalić, J., & Stepanović, N. (2018). Methodology for control delay estimation using new algorithm for critical points identification. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, vol. 144, no. 2, 04017073.
40. Yu, H., Kong, J., Ren, Y., & Yin, C. (2020). On the Urban Link Fundamental Diagram Based on Velocity-Weighted Flow and Queue Length. Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 11, 1852.
41. Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020). Factors affecting traffic flow efficiency implications of connected and autonomous vehicles: A review and policy recommendations. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, vol. 5, 1-50.
42. Calle-Laguna, A. J., Du, J., & Rakha, H. A. (2019). Computing optimum traffic signal cycle length considering vehicle delay and fuel consumption. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 3, 100021.